How an Arm-type Tool Magazine Reduces Downtime in Shoe Mold Milling Machines

24 09,2025
KAIBO CNC
Application Tips
This article explores the automatic tool changer (ATC) system on Ningbo Kebor CNC Machinery Co.'s DC6060A 5-axis shoe mold milling machine, focusing on the arm-type tool magazine structure and its operational workflow. It addresses the common challenge of prolonged downtime during tool changes in shoe mold manufacturing, offering practical guidance on setting up tool change parameters, calibrating coordinates, and optimizing tool paths—backed by real-world examples and visual aids. Designed for technicians and production managers, this guide delivers actionable steps to boost continuous operation efficiency and overall productivity in high-mix, high-speed environments.
产品配图_1739415382422.jpg

How to Reduce Downtime in Shoe Mold Machining with an Arm-Type Tool Changer

As a production engineer who’s spent over 12 years optimizing CNC workflows in footwear manufacturing, I’ve seen firsthand how a poorly tuned automatic tool changer (ATC) can turn a high-efficiency machine into a bottleneck. On average, shoe mold shops lose 4–7 minutes per tool change when using manual or outdated systems—adding up to over 2 hours of lost productivity daily on just one machine.

Take the DC6060A five-axis shoe mold milling machine from Ningbo Kaibo CNC Machinery Co., Ltd.—it’s not just about having an ATC; it’s about making sure that arm-type system work seamlessly. Let me walk you through what makes this setup so effective—and how to get the most out of it.

Why Arm-Type Tool Libraries Outperform Drum or Disc Systems

In a typical shoe mold shop running 3 shifts, every minute counts. A drum-style changer might handle 20 tools efficiently—but if your job requires 40+ tool changes per run, you’ll face delays due to slower indexing and less flexibility. The arm-type design, however, allows for direct pick-and-place motion, reducing average cycle time from 28 seconds to under 15 seconds, according to real-world tests at our client facilities in Guangdong.

Tool Library Type Avg. Change Time Best For
Arm-Type 12–15 sec High-mix, multi-tool jobs
Drum-Type 25–30 sec Low-variety, long runs
Disc-Type 20–25 sec Medium-volume batches

Key Settings That Make or Break Your ATC Performance

Here’s where many operators miss the mark: setting the wrong acceleration/deceleration values or skipping coordinate calibration. If your X/Y/Z axes aren’t aligned within ±0.02mm before each tool change, even a perfect arm movement will fail. We recommend calibrating every 2 weeks—or after any major maintenance.

Also, don’t ignore path optimization. By adjusting the tool approach angle—from 45° to 60°—we helped a client reduce tool collision risk by 60% while increasing throughput by 18%. It’s small tweaks like these that compound into big gains over time.

Arm-type tool changer mechanism inside a DC6060A five-axis shoe mold mill, showing smooth blade transfer between storage and spindle.

Common Issues & How to Fix Them Fast

One frequent issue? The arm fails to return to home position after changing tools. Often, it’s a misaligned sensor—not a broken motor. Check the proximity switch alignment first—it should be within 0.5mm of the target. Another tip: keep the tool holder clamping force consistent across all stations. Use a torque wrench set to 35N·m for optimal grip without damaging the collet.

These aren’t just theory—they’re lessons learned from helping 30+ shoe mold factories improve uptime. One customer saw their average monthly downtime drop from 16 hours to just 4 after implementing these practices.

Ready to optimize your own ATC workflow? Download our free “5-Step Arm-Type Tool Changer Setup Checklist”—used by engineers in China, Vietnam, and Turkey—to ensure your next tool change is faster, smoother, and more reliable.

Get the Free Setup Guide Now
Name *
Email *
Message*

Recommended Products

Contact us
Contact us
https://shmuker.oss-cn-hangzhou.aliyuncs.com/tmp/temporary/60ec5bd7f8d5a86c84ef79f2/60ec5bdcf8d5a86c84ef7a9a/thumb-prev.png